This paper will present the results of the pilot testing, design equations that can be used to scale up the pilot test results and a comparison of this technology with more conventional treatment technologies (packed column aeration and granular activated carbon). Preliminary cost comparisons indicate that this technology is significantly more cost-effective than packed column aeration or granular activated carbon in removing VOCs and other contaminants of concern.

Details
First NameBob
Last NameRaczko, PE
KeywordsGas Permeable Hydrophobic Membranes, Removal, Drinking Water
Year12
FileW-1A-2_RaczkoBob.pdf